Val Chmerkovskiy Defends Jenna Dewan Amid ‘Dancing With the Stars’ Casting Backlash
Our take

Okay, here's a comprehensive editorial "Our Take" piece, adhering to all the specified requirements, about the Val Chmerkovskiy/Jenna Dewan *Dancing With the Stars* casting backlash.
---
The uproar surrounding Jenna Dewan’s return to *Dancing With the Stars* as a co-host, alongside Alfonso Ribeiro, has predictably sparked a flurry of online debate, but Val Chmerkovskiy’s recent defense – declaring it “naive” to think DWTS is just about dance – cuts to the heart of a much larger evolution within reality competition television. It’s a sentiment that resonates deeply with anyone who’s followed the show’s trajectory over the years. The initial appeal of *DWTS* was undeniably the spectacle of celebrity transformation through dance, the rigorous training, and the surprisingly compelling narratives of skill acquisition. However, as the show has aged, it's become increasingly clear that the dance itself is merely a vehicle for broader entertainment – a platform for personalities, drama, and, crucially, nostalgia. This shift has been mirrored across the reality TV landscape; look at the evolution of *The Bachelor* The Bachelor's Changing Format or the continued success of shows like *RuPaul’s Drag Race* RuPaul's Drag Race Evolution – entertainment value increasingly outweighs technical proficiency. Chmerkovskiy’s comment isn’t a dismissal of dance; it’s an acknowledgment of the show’s shifting priorities, and a pointed reminder that audiences tune in for more than just pirouettes.
The backlash against Dewan's return is, in part, rooted in a romanticized view of the show’s early days, a longing for a time when the focus was ostensibly on the dance and the underdog stories of hopeful amateurs. Many feel that her presence, coupled with the increasingly elaborate production elements and emphasis on celebrity personalities over dance skill, dilutes the original spirit of the competition. However, this perspective ignores the fundamental truth that *Dancing With the Stars* has always been a hybrid – a blend of performance art, celebrity culture, and manufactured drama. The casting choices, the elimination formats, the pre-taped packages highlighting contestants’ personal lives – these have always been integral components of the show's appeal, arguably more so than the technical quality of the dancing itself. Dewan’s experience as a former contestant and her established presence in the entertainment industry arguably make her a natural fit for a hosting role, bringing a level of familiarity and star power that aligns with the show’s current direction. To demand that *DWTS* remain solely a showcase for technical dance prowess is to fundamentally misunderstand its evolution and its enduring appeal.
The real issue isn't Dewan’s casting, but rather the broader question of what audiences *want* from reality television in 2024. The landscape has become increasingly fragmented, with viewers having access to an overwhelming array of content. Reality shows need to offer more than just a straightforward competition; they need to provide emotional investment, relatable characters, and a sense of community. *Dancing With the Stars*, like many of its contemporaries, has recognized this and adapted accordingly. The emphasis on personality and narrative arc serves a crucial function: it provides viewers with something to latch onto, a reason to tune in week after week beyond the fleeting spectacle of a dance routine. It's a calculated strategy, and one that, despite the occasional wave of nostalgia-fueled criticism, has proven remarkably effective in sustaining the show’s longevity. The constant striving for increased engagement, often at the expense of perceived authenticity, is a defining characteristic of the modern reality TV ecosystem.
Looking ahead, it’s worth considering whether other dance competitions will follow suit. Will we see a greater blurring of lines between performance and personality, a more deliberate cultivation of drama, and a greater reliance on celebrity hosts and judges? The continued success of *Dancing With the Stars*, even in its evolved form, suggests that the answer is likely yes. The question then becomes: at what point does the pursuit of entertainment value overshadow the core appeal of the art form itself, and does the audience even notice, or ultimately care? The dance may be the foundation, but the spectacle – the glamour, the chaos, the personalities – is increasingly what keeps the lights on.
---
Val says it’s “naive” to think DWTS is just about dance.
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience